A few years ago I was pleased to prepare the coat of arms for my friend and high school classmate, Archbishop Henning of Boston. At that time I was told his predecessor, Sean Cardinal O’Malley, OFM, Cap. would probably modify his arms to remove the impalement with the See of Boston but that there “was no hurry on that”, which is true enough.
Well, the time finally rolled around that His Eminence wanted to take care of that detail and I was commissioned to do the task.

His Eminence wanted to make no changes at all to the arms he first assumed in 1984 when he was appointed Coadjutor Bishop of St. Thomas in the US Virgin Islands. He used these same arms during his time as Bishop of Fall River, Massachusetts, and as Bishop of Palm Beach, Florida as well as during his tenure as Metropolitan Archbishop of Boston.
The field of these arms is red and displays a three masted sailing ship, at full sail, all in gold (yellow). This charge is taken from the portion of the arms associated with the name O’Malley that is known as the crest (i.e. the upper-most portion, usually above a helmet). This ship is placed amid three silver (white) stars that are taken from the arms of General George Washington, whose arms are used as the device of our federal capital city, where His Eminence was serving as a priest when he was selected to receive the fullness of Christ’s most holy priesthood as a bishop. The upper portion of Cardinal O’Malley’s personal arms are the arms of the Order of Saint Francis, (O.F.M. – the Order of Friars Minor – a loose translation of tile Latin for the Order of Little Brothers) signifying that Cardinal O’Malley is a Capuchin Franciscan. These arms show on a black cross, the crossed arms of Christ and Saint Francis, each bearing the Stigmata.
The big change was “un-impaling” or “un-marshaling” his personal arms with those of the See of Boston now that he is the Archbishop-Emeritus. Of course he retains the archiepiscopal cross in his achievement as well as the scarlet galero of a Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church. Perhaps the biggest difference comes with the cross placed behind the shield. Since 1984 until now the Cardinal has displayed two chivalric crosses behind his shield. One was the red and silver “Cruz de Cristo” to signify that Cardinal O’Malley was named a Knight Commander of the Order of Prince Henry the Navigator in 1974 by the Portuguese government for outstanding service to the Portuguese people. The other was a white Maltese Cross. The inclusion of this cross signifies that Cardinal O’Malley was named as a Chaplain “Ad Honorum” of the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St. John of Jerusalem, Rhodes and Malta in 1991. This Order is more commonly known as the Knights of Malta. In this present emblazonment only the cross of the Order of Malta is being displayed.
When I was commissioned to do this work I pointed out to His Eminence, with respect, that it wasn’t really correct to display two different crosses of chivalric orders in this fashion. In addition, I prepared a treatment for him in which I traced the various regulations concerning the arms of Cardinals, Archbishops and Bishops issued by different Popes throughout the centuries. I cited the Apostolic Constitution “Militans Ecclesiae Regimini” of Pope Innocent X from Dec. 19, 1644; the Motu Proprio “Inter Multiplices Curas” of St. Pius X from February 21, 1905; in particular the Decree of the Consistorial Congregation “Apostolica Constitutione” approved by Pope Benedict XV from January 15, 1915; the Decree of the Consistorial Congregation, “Attentis Disponitionibus” approved by Pope Pius XII from May 12, 1951 (which reaffirmed the decrees of Innocent X & Benedict XV) and the Instruction “Ut Sive Solicite” from the Secretariat of State under St. Paul VI from March 31, 1969, as well as others.
It was the decree of Innocent X in 1644 that established that the armorial bearings of Cardinals should not contain any secular honors in the form of coronets indicating noble rank, or decorations from Orders of chivalry. According to this decree, never revoked, the armiger and even the artist depicting the coat of arms were excommunicated latae sententiae for including secular marks of honor in a coat of arms. Without revoking Innocent X’s entire document that excommunication was eventually revoked by Pope Pius IX in his Constitution, “Apostolicae Sedis” in 1869 which was also upheld and affirmed by Benedict XV in 1915. This set an early precedent which was later affirmed by other Popes. In particular, the decree approved by Benedict XV in 1915 says,
“Omnes S.R.E. Cardinales ad unitatem et aequalitatem ordinjs construendam, iubeant e propiis sigillis et insignibus quibuscumque, vulgo armis nuncupatis, amoveri coronas, signa ac omnes notas seculares, praeter eas quibus intra scutum armorum eorum familiae tamquam de essentia et integritate eorumdem armorum utuntur, et ut in posterum ab illorum usu abstineant. …aut nisi agatur de Ordine equestri S. Ioannes Hierosolymitani aut S. Sepulchri.”
“All Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, in order to establish unity and equality within the Order, let them be required to remove crowns, emblems, and all secular insignia—commonly known as coats of arms—from their personal seals and devices of any kind (except for those elements used within the shield of their family arms as integral and essential parts thereof), and to refrain from using them in the future… unless the matter concerns the Equestrian Order of St. John of Jerusalem or the Order of the Holy Sepulchre.”
Archbishop Bruno Heim in his seminal work, Heraldry in the Catholic Church (Van Duren Press, 1978) says clearly that,
“Cardinals are forbidden to add crowns, mantles, supporters, decorations or any other honorific signs to their achievements, with the exception of the crosses of the Order of Malta and of the Holy Sepulchre.” (page 102).
After considering my suggestion, His Eminence elected to display just the cross of the Order of Malta in his achievement going forward. It was very gratifying to see His Eminence take my recommendation seriously. This, I must add, also proves a point that I have been making for quite a few years over and over in the pages of this blog. Namely, that heraldry isn’t just about drawing pretty pictures. One needs also to do the work, to do the research, to know what one is talking about especially with the scant and often sketchy regulations the Church has regarding ecclesiastical heraldry.
This was a very fun and interesting project on which to work. I have now had the opportunity to do this same thing for Cardinal Dolan as well as for Cardinal O’Malley. Perhaps there is a new area of expertise for me to develop: UN-impaling the coats of arms of bishops emeriti!





